The greater part of this section will be taken from a book

WW2 Documentary The greater part of this section will be taken from a book about the War of 1812. I should deconstruct the all inclusive statements and decipher the significance as it identifies with our examination of authority and cronyism or Synarchy. Officers in the wars of these circumstances got a rate of the goods their subordinates took. They additionally were much of the time adjusted to the adversary or opposite side as should be obvious in the motion picture Braveheart. The Black Market in advanced wars has a considerable measure of a similar sort of thing. This motivating force to go to war has a great deal of effect on us still. The British had recently taken around 2,000 slaves or "runaways" from close Baltimore to be a piece of the workforce in the Canadian Maritime Provinces. As we have noted as of now, the American Enlightenment Experiment had happened when Nobles in America saw their British cousins were liberating their slaves. It was not by any means the only motivation to withdraw however it was likely more vital than the reasons for the most part displayed in American movement exams or schools. Now and then it is less expensive not to need to administer to your workforce on the off chance that you have a framework that keeps them set up.

"New Orleans, found a hundred miles up the Mississippi River, was an especially enticing target. With a populace of just about 25,000, it was the biggest city west of the Appalachian Mountains. It was likewise the primary outlet for western wares, and a great many dollars of deliver was barred in the port. Scottish maritime officers like Cochrane were known to have a sharp eye for goods, and the British conveyed substantial payload ships with them to take away their loot. (1) Indeed, British detainees of war and betrayers asserted that the watch-word and catchword on the morning of the Battle of New Orleans was 'excellence and goods'. (2)

At first British authorities saw this crusade as a method for taking weight of Canada. However, when the operation got going, the goal had changed. General Ross- - who should lead the endeavor - was told 'To get summon of the embouchure [mouth] of the Mississippi, in order to deny the back settlements of America of their correspondence with the ocean' and 'to involve some critical and significant ownership, by the reclamation of which the states of peace may be enhanced, or which we may be qualified for correct the cession of, as the cost of peace.' Ross was to urge the free tenants to revolt however was to make no coupling guarantees about what's to come. '[Y]ou must give them plainly to comprehend that Great Britain can't vow herself to make the autonomy of Louisiana, or its rebuilding to the Spanish Crown, a sine qua non of peace with the United States.'(3)

As a preparatory to the fundamental campaign, in May of 1814 Cochrane dispatched a shipload of arms to Indians on the Apalachicola River in Spanish Florida." (4)

So we can solicit a great deal from inquiries at this crossroads I trust.

We realize that the race card was being utilized by Britain as a part of this war and there are motivations to believe that the establishing of the United State had more to do with servitude in any case than any Tea Party or expenses. England had prohibited bondage 10 years before the US was made. Servitude in Greece was more awful than whenever in the US or somewhere else, in spite of the fact that Columbus (an operator of the Holy Alliance and Hibernian or Alumbrados powers) positively accomplished more than most Greek states in such manner. He was taking part in mass genocide intentionally so I don't think of it as minor subjugation.

That is not the entire explanation behind the making of the United States and there could be a decent contention made for the strengths of the supposed New World Order acting to make the US what it has gotten to be. I have demonstrated the Indians are regularly operators for the Synarchists or world class and mystery social orders in numerous books and you can discover the Sioux following up for them in this book. Joseph Brant and Sitting Bull are a piece of a similar continuum including the Mediwiwin Society which was Masonic before the landing of the travelers and a few people think Abraham Lincoln was a Melungeon. I think the Bairds are comparatively associated with the Huguenots we will see a religious Baird of the nineteenth Century composed broadly about. Be that as it may, the majority of this interest is only the what tops off an already good thing or shallow tidbits of open melodrama. The truth of the matter is much more refined and the powers of force are utilizing a 'play both closures against the center' or Hegelian Dialectic.

The British could enter Pensacola with the help of the neighborhood Spanish authorities. Be that as it may, the Spanish disliked Major Nicholls enrolling slaves and approaching all slaves to oppose their 'simpleton governments'. He then attempted to take Mobile which had been taken by the Americans in 1813. I request that you take some time to consider Jean Lafitte and his part as a Spanish operator at this point. Is it accurate to say that he was truly only a specialist occupied with subjugation? Why did he work with the Americans and were the Spanish much the same as the French in their offer of the Louisiana Purchase at an abnormal state? I advise you that the Spanish Government was a unimportant vassal state for the Vatican since much sooner than Rodrigo Borgia held the Papal Bull tending to inbreeding over the heads of Isabella and Ferdinand.

Most imperative to think about is as a mystery game plan amongst Britain and Rome that clearly was last communicated at the Treaty of Verona. This understanding is known as the Holy Alliance and a few people think the Maritime Laws are a piece of it. I am certain they are a unimportant and straightforward case of the entire gambit in any case. It is associated with the Treaty of Tordesillas and the make up of the New World Order. The first class have in actuality oversaw both sides for far longer than this and therir are sure families who have utilized countries as unimportant fronts for quite a while. It retreats much sooner than what we call history. Same individuals - all the time - in consistently for in any event the 5,000 years James Joyce alluded to as a "bad dream" as cited by Campbell in Gimbutas' Language of the Goddess.